McGrath, P.J., Lingley-Pottie, P., Johnson Emberly, D., Thurston,C., McLean, C. (2009). Integrated Knowledge Translation in Mental Health: Family Help as an Example. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 18(1), 30-37.
Format: Peer-reviewed article
Type: Research — Non-experimental
Experience level of reader: Fundamental
Annotation: The authors employ an integrated knowledge translation approach to design, implement and communicate mental health research. Integrated knowledge translation requires that representatives from all key stakeholder groups be actively involved in the research project, from its inception to its completion.
Setting(s) to which the reported activities/findings are relevant: Community, Government, University
Knowledge user(s) to whom the piece of literature may be relevant: Clinicians, Policy Makers, Researchers
Knowledge user level addressed by the literature: Organization
This article uses the Commercial Devices and Services version of the NtK Model
Method: Involve stakeholders in the development and execution of a comprehensive communication plan. Communication vehicles should be tailored to respective stakeholder groups (e.g., for physicians and other health professionals — private visits to clinic offices, group-based presentations; for educators, care providers, community members, end users and the media — public appearances, including information booths at local malls, storefronts and community exhibits). Other community communication vehicles include newsletters, public awareness campaigns and advertisements. Professional communication includes interactions at local conferences.
Applying integrated KT in Mental Health research.
Occurrence of finding within the model: KTA Tip 1.3, Step 3.1, Step 3.3
Barrier: Researchers that use the integrated KT (which leverages the involvement of key stakeholders from research inception to completion) process may encounter several challenges when they attempt to use research evidence to influence government policy in program delivery. Research evidence competes for the attention of policy-makers with other influencers, such as, public opinion, institutional constraints and fiscal constraints. Researchers can strengthen the likelihood of KT success by better understanding the policy-making process, regularly interacting with policy-makers, building trusted relationships and partnerships, and engaging in the timely communication of research findings. (Waddell [2005])
Occurrence of finding within the model: KTA Step 1.D, KTA Step 2.C, KTA Step 2.D, KTA Step 1.C, KTA Step 3.C, KTA Step 3.D
Method: Integrated KT is a collaborative, participatory, action-oriented way of conducting research that results in the co-creation of knowledge by researchers and knowledge users. The end result of this collaboration is the integration of research findings into clinical practice in a more structured, efficient, expedient and effective manner. (Tetroe [2007])
Tip: Integrated KT (which leverages the involvement of key stakeholders from research inception to completion) is not appropriate for all research. Some research is not intended to produce a result that should be directly used in policy making, clinical care or public health. (Tetroe [2007])